Summary:
The European Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) is the central pillar of the EU response against climate change. This trading mechanism is considered, from the theoretical point of view, as the most cost-effective method to reduce GHG. However, previous studies show that the agents who participate in these markets may behave in a way that may lead to inefficient CO2 prices, creating doubts about the static and dynamic efficiency of the system. This article analyses these possible anomalies by first trying to model the ETS in a more realistic way, addressing some of the limitations of previous models, and second, by comparing the results with real market transactions. For this, a bottom-up, multi-sector model has been built, which represents the EU ETS in an integrated, cross-sectoral way, paying particular attention to the interactions among the most emissions intensive industries. The results show the benefits of this modelling approach and how it better reflects real market conditions. Some preliminary conclusions regarding the behaviour of the agents in the ETS market are also presented.
Keywords: abatement costs; company behaviour; emissions pricing; EU Emissions Trading Scheme; industrial emissions
JCR Impact Factor and WoS quartile: 4,797 - Q1 (2018); 5,300 - Q1 (2023)
DOI reference:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1294045
Published on paper: April 2018.
Published on-line: March 2017.
Citation:
P. Pintos, P. Linares, Assessing the EU ETS with a bottom-up, multisector model. Climate Policy. Vol. 18, nº. 4, pp. 413 - 424, April 2018. [Online: March 2017]
